ProEnrollment LLC vs Medallion
ProEnrollment LLC vs Medallion: Quick Answer
Medallion raised $85M from Sequoia & Google Ventures. Their software still requires your staff. ProEnrollment is fully managed from $3,600/year.
ProEnrollment vs Medallion: Service Depth vs Platform Automation
Medallion is a venture-backed credentialing automation platform focused on digital health companies and telehealth startups, offering API-driven licensing and credentialing workflows. ProEnrollment is a hands-on credentialing service with 9+ years of payer-relations experience. Medallion's automation excels when you have an internal operations team that wants tooling. ProEnrollment excels when you want experienced specialists handling every payer interaction directly — including the judgment calls and escalations automation can't make.
Where Automation Hits Its Limits
Credentialing is full of edge cases automation handles poorly: a payer requesting clarification on a work-history gap, a closed panel requiring a network adequacy appeal, a CAQH attestation conflict, a state Medicaid portal rejecting an application for an undocumented formatting rule. Medallion's platform routes these exceptions back to your team. ProEnrollment's specialists resolve them directly — our 99.4% first-time approval rate comes from preventing these issues in the 12-point pre-submission audit, not from automating around them after they occur.
Pricing and Practice Fit
Medallion's pricing targets funded digital health companies and scales with platform usage. ProEnrollment charges flat per-provider pricing suited to independent practices, group practices, and growing telehealth providers without enterprise budgets. For multi-state telehealth credentialing — Medallion's specialty — compare our results: 3 providers credentialed in 8 states in 180 days. Telehealth credentialing services | all comparisons | free consultation.
Bottom Line
Medallion fits venture-backed digital health companies with ops teams that want platform tooling and APIs. ProEnrollment fits providers and groups that want experienced humans owning the outcome — including the escalations, appeals, and judgment calls automation routes back to you. Both are legitimate models; the question is whether you're buying software for your team or results from ours.